Given the snippet below,

match foo {
    bar => {
    },
    baz => some.
        call().
        chain(),
    qux => match foo {
        bar => (),
    },
}

we emit a folding range for the match, for the first arms block expression and for the third arms match expression, for consistency we should emit a fold for the entire multine line expression in the second and third ar

Should be done after #12934.

Page

• Cheatsheet

Abstract

When we're done cleaning up the cheatsheet, we could add more interesting information that's already described elsewhere but less concisely. Some ideas:

• Table of available types.
• Various types of literals (in particular string literals like

(As discussed in #885,) the current benchmark suite has a few shortcomings.

The most obvious one is that there is no standardized dataset. Past ideas involved using large Git repositories (Linux, Chromium, Rust compiler), but these repositories change over time. We can not simply check out a certain state because the .git folder will still grow. It'

复现流程与链接

将demo中的react版本修改为17.0.2，运行后编辑器中组件无法选中

期望结果

可以正常运行

环境信息

• 引擎版本 1.0.1-beta.1
• ext 版本 1.0.2
• 物料
  • moment﹫2.24.0
  • lodash
  • ﹫alifd/next﹫1.24.18
  • NextTable﹫1.0.1
  • ﹫alilc/lowcode-materials﹫1.0.1
  • ﹫alifd/pro-layout﹫1.0.1-beta.5
  • ﹫alifd/fusion-ui﹫1.0.5-beta.1

In GET /store/auth/:email, replace the current check to use customer.has_account on these lines like so:

const customer = await customerService.retrieveByEmail(email)
res.status(200).json({ exists: customer.has_account })

System information

Geth
Version: 1.10.13-stable
Git Commit: 7a0c19f813e285516f4b525305fd73b625d2dec8
Architecture: amd64
Go Version: go1.17.3
Operating System: linux
GOPATH=
GOROOT=go

Expected behaviour

Close files that aren't in use / have a settable limit

Actual behaviour

Every database file it opens stays open for the duration of the sync

Steps to re

https://github.com/marcel-dempers/docker-development-youtube-series/blob/master/storage/redis/kubernetes/sentinel/sentinel-statefulset.yaml#L22

i think it's a security issue but idk maybe not, im new at kubernetes. this line seems like wrong, i guess it should come from the secret config/config map.