Skip to content

Conversation

jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

I was a bit fast with merging the backport #62329 for updating the StringDtype repr. I thought it was good to already have this change on 2.3 as well (since it eg shows up when looking at the dtype, when we print the dtype in assert messages, etc).
But probably safest to not change it in 2.3.x for the existing NA-based StringDtype that people are already using, but only for the new one (where there are less concerns about backwards compatibility in a bugfix release)

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 2.3.3 milestone Sep 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant