Skip to content

Bump senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml from 3 to 4#30

Merged
docktermj merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/senzing-factory/build-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

Bump senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml from 3 to 4#30
docktermj merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/senzing-factory/build-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Feb 12, 2026

Bumps senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml from 3 to 4.

Release notes

Sourced from senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml's releases.

4.0.0

What's Changed

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...4.0.0

3.0.31

What's Changed

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.31

3.0.30

What's Changed

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.30

3.0.29

What's Changed

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.29

3.0.28

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.28

3.0.27

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.27

3.0.26

Full Changelog: senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...3.0.26

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml's changelog.

Changelog

All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.

The format is based on Keep a Changelog, markdownlint, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.

[Unreleased]

  • Thing 5
  • Thing 4

[1.0.1] - yyyy-mm-dd

Added to 1.0.1

  • Thing 3

Fixed in 1.0.1

  • Thing 2

[1.0.0] - yyyy-mm-dd

Added to 1.0.0

  • Thing 2
  • Thing 1
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Resolves #260
Resolves #261
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#261
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#257
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#259
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#254
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#250
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#255
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#249
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#256
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#252
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#253
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#244
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#246
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#248

…slack-notification.yaml

Bumps [senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources) from 3 to 4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](senzing-factory/build-resources@v3...v4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml
  dependency-version: '4'
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Feb 12, 2026
@dependabot dependabot Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 19:26
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Feb 12, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

Code follows style guide - The changes are simple version bumps in GitHub Actions workflow files. The YAML formatting is consistent and follows standard conventions.

No commented-out code - All code is active and properly formatted.

Meaningful variable names - N/A for this change (no new variables introduced).

DRY principle followed - The change is repetitive by nature (updating version references), which is appropriate for dependency version bumps.

Identify Defects - No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities identified. This is a straightforward dependency version update from @v3 to @v4 for the build-failure-slack-notification workflow across multiple workflow files.

Project memory compliance - No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository, so no project-specific guidelines to check.

Testing

Unit tests for new functions - Not applicable, but there's a broader concern: No evidence that the @v4 version of the referenced workflow has been tested or validated to work with these workflows. The PR should verify that:

  • The @v4 version exists in the senzing-factory/build-resources repository
  • The interface/inputs haven't changed between v3 and v4
  • The functionality works as expected

⚠️ Integration tests - While direct integration tests aren't applicable for workflow version bumps, manual verification or testing in a staging environment would be prudent.

Edge cases covered - No test coverage information provided for this change.

Test coverage > 80% - Not applicable for GitHub Actions workflow configuration changes.

Documentation

⚠️ Readme updated if needed - No README changes included. Consider documenting:

  • Why the version was bumped
  • What changed in v4 vs v3
  • Any breaking changes or new features

API docs updated - Not applicable for this change.

Inline comments for complex logic - Not needed; the change is self-explanatory.

CHANGELOG.md updated - No CHANGELOG.md update detected. This version bump should be documented with:

  • What workflow version was updated
  • Why it was updated
  • Any relevant release notes from the upstream v4 release

Markdown files follow CommonMark - No markdown files were modified in this PR.

Security

No hardcoded credentials - No credentials in the diff.

Input validation implemented - Not applicable for this change.

Proper error handling - The workflows already have proper error handling with the if: ${{ always() && contains(...) }} conditions.

No sensitive data in logs - No sensitive data exposed.

No license files - No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected.


Summary

Overall Assessment: ⚠️ CONDITIONAL APPROVAL

The code changes are technically sound and consistent, but the PR lacks:

  1. Documentation of the change - No CHANGELOG.md entry explaining the version bump
  2. Verification evidence - No indication that v4 was tested or that breaking changes were reviewed
  3. Context - No explanation of why this upgrade is being performed

Required Actions:

  1. Add CHANGELOG.md entry documenting this version bump
  2. Verify compatibility - Confirm that build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4 exists and is compatible
  3. Document breaking changes - If v4 introduces any breaking changes, document the mitigation

Files Modified:

  • .github/workflows/add-labels-standardized.yaml:25
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage-dependabot.yaml:24
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage.yaml:27
  • .github/workflows/create-sphinx-documentation.yaml:57
  • .github/workflows/pylint.yaml:54
  • .github/workflows/pytest-darwin.yaml:81
  • .github/workflows/pytest-linux.yaml:82
  • .github/workflows/pytest-windows.yaml:80

All changes follow the same pattern: updating the uses: reference from @v3 to @v4.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

@kernelsam kernelsam self-assigned this Feb 12, 2026
@docktermj docktermj self-assigned this Feb 13, 2026
@docktermj docktermj enabled auto-merge (squash) February 13, 2026 16:14
…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

Code follows style guide - The changes are minimal version bumps in GitHub Actions workflow files, which don't involve actual code implementation. The YAML formatting is consistent and proper.

No commented-out code - Clean diff with only active configuration changes.

Meaningful variable names - N/A for this change (version bump only).

DRY principle followed - N/A for this change.

Identify Defects - No defects identified. The changes consistently update the reusable workflow version from @v3 to @v4 across all files. This is a standard dependency update pattern.

Project memory configuration - No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in this repository based on the git status, so this criterion is not applicable.

Testing

⚠️ Testing considerations - These are GitHub Actions workflow updates. The changes should be verified by:

  • Ensuring the referenced workflow senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4 exists and is stable
  • Monitoring the next workflow run to confirm notifications work correctly

No unit/integration tests are applicable for workflow version bumps, but functional validation is recommended.

Documentation

Readme updated if needed - No README updates needed for internal workflow version bumps.

API docs updated - N/A for workflow files.

Inline comments - No complex logic requiring comments.

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md - Not updated in this PR. Consider adding an entry like:

### Changed
- Updated build-failure-slack-notification workflow from v3 to v4

Markdown formatting - No markdown files were modified.

Security

No hardcoded credentials - Credentials properly passed via secrets.

Input validation - N/A for this change.

Proper error handling - The workflows maintain their existing error handling patterns.

No sensitive data in logs - No changes to logging behavior.

No license files checked in - No .lic files or AQAAAD strings present in the diff.


Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor suggestion

This is a clean, consistent dependency update across 8 workflow files. All files update the same reusable workflow from v3 to v4. The changes are low-risk and follow a standard maintenance pattern.

Files Modified:

  • .github/workflows/add-labels-standardized.yaml:25
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage-dependabot.yaml:24
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage.yaml:27
  • .github/workflows/create-sphinx-documentation.yaml:57
  • .github/workflows/pylint.yaml:54
  • .github/workflows/pytest-darwin.yaml:81
  • .github/workflows/pytest-linux.yaml:82
  • .github/workflows/pytest-windows.yaml:80

Recommendation: Consider adding a CHANGELOG.md entry to document this infrastructure update. Otherwise, the PR is ready to merge.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

I'll review this pull request against the provided checklist. Let me analyze the diff.

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

  • Code follows style guide: The changes are minimal version bumps in GitHub Actions workflow files. The YAML formatting is consistent and follows standard conventions.
  • No commented-out code: No commented code present in the diff.
  • Meaningful variable names: N/A - only version numbers changed.
  • DRY principle followed: N/A - this is a version update.
  • Identify Defects: No bugs, logic errors, edge cases, crashes, race conditions, memory leaks, or security vulnerabilities detected. This is a straightforward version bump from @v3 to @v4 of a reusable workflow.

Files affected:

  • .github/workflows/add-labels-standardized.yaml:25
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage-dependabot.yaml:24
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage.yaml:27
  • .github/workflows/create-sphinx-documentation.yaml:57
  • .github/workflows/pylint.yaml:54
  • .github/workflows/pytest-darwin.yaml:81
  • .github/workflows/pytest-linux.yaml:82
  • .github/workflows/pytest-windows.yaml:80

Testing

  • Unit tests for new functions: N/A - no new functions added.
  • Integration tests for new endpoints: N/A - no new endpoints added.
  • Edge cases covered: N/A - workflow version update.
  • ⚠️ Test coverage > 80%: Cannot verify from diff alone - this is a workflow update, not code changes.

Documentation

  • Readme updated if needed: Not required - this is an internal workflow dependency update.
  • API docs updated: N/A - no API changes.
  • Inline comments for complex logic: N/A - no complex logic added.
  • CHANGELOG.md updated: No CHANGELOG.md update detected. If this project maintains a changelog, it should document the workflow dependency update.
  • Markdown files follow CommonMark: N/A - no markdown files modified.

Security

  • No hardcoded credentials: No credentials in the diff.
  • Input validation implemented: N/A - workflow version update.
  • Proper error handling: N/A - no new error handling needed.
  • No sensitive data in logs: No sensitive data detected.
  • No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings: None detected.

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor note

This PR performs a consistent, mechanical update across 8 GitHub Actions workflow files, bumping the build-failure-slack-notification.yaml workflow from @v3 to @v4. The changes are:

  • Consistent: All 8 files updated identically
  • Safe: No logic changes, only version references
  • Low Risk: Updating to a newer version of a notification workflow

Minor Note:

  • If this repository maintains a CHANGELOG.md, consider adding an entry like:
    ### Changed
    - Updated build-failure-slack-notification workflow from v3 to v4

Recommendation: Merge after verifying that the @v4 version of the build-failure-slack-notification.yaml workflow is stable and tested in the senzing-factory/build-resources repository.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

Code follows style guide - The changes are purely version bumps in YAML workflow files. The formatting is consistent and follows standard GitHub Actions syntax.

No commented-out code - No commented code found.

Meaningful variable names - Not applicable; changes are only to version references.

DRY principle followed - Not applicable; these are declarative workflow configurations.

No defects identified - The changes are straightforward version bumps from @v3 to @v4 for the build-failure-slack-notification.yaml workflow. All 8 occurrences have been updated consistently across all workflow files.

Project memory considerations - No ./.claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository, so no project-specific review criteria to consider.

Testing

Testing not addressed - No tests are included or modified for these workflow changes. However, this may be acceptable if:

  • The @v4 workflow has been tested independently in the senzing-factory/build-resources repository
  • These are integration updates that don't require repo-specific tests

Recommendation: Verify that the @v4 version of the workflow has been tested and is stable before merging.

Documentation

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md not updated - No CHANGELOG.md update is included in this diff. This version bump should be documented.

Files affected:

  • .github/workflows/add-labels-standardized.yaml:25
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage-dependabot.yaml:24
  • .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage.yaml:27
  • .github/workflows/create-sphinx-documentation.yaml:57
  • .github/workflows/pylint.yaml:54
  • .github/workflows/pytest-darwin.yaml:81
  • .github/workflows/pytest-linux.yaml:82
  • .github/workflows/pytest-windows.yaml:80

No README or inline documentation - While workflow files don't typically require extensive documentation, it would be helpful to know what changes are in @v4 vs @v3. Consider adding a commit message that explains what improvements or fixes are in the new version.

Security

No hardcoded credentials - No credentials are hardcoded; secrets are properly referenced via ${{ secrets.SLACK_BOT_TOKEN }}.

No sensitive data in logs - Not applicable to these changes.

No license files - No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected in the diff.

Input validation - Not applicable; these are declarative workflow configurations.

Proper error handling - The workflows already have proper conditional execution based on job status.

Summary

Approval Status: ⚠️ Conditionally Approve with Recommendations

The changes are mechanically correct and consistent, but missing documentation:

  1. Required: Update CHANGELOG.md to document this workflow version upgrade
  2. Recommended: Verify that build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4 has been tested and document what changes it introduces
  3. Recommended: Ensure the commit message explains the reason for the version bump (bug fixes, new features, breaking changes, etc.)

The code itself is clean and the pattern of updating all 8 references consistently shows good attention to detail.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

I'll proceed with the review based on the diff content and general best practices.

Code Review Results

Code Quality

Code follows style guide

  • All changes are straightforward version bumps in YAML workflow files
  • YAML formatting is consistent and properly indented
  • No code logic changes that would violate style guidelines

No commented-out code

  • Clean diff with no commented code blocks

Meaningful variable names

  • N/A - No new variables introduced

DRY principle followed

  • N/A - Only version number updates across multiple files
  • Note: The repetitive pattern across 8 workflow files is acceptable for CI/CD configurations where each file serves a distinct purpose

Identify Defects

  • No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities introduced
  • Version bump from @v3 to @v4 appears intentional and consistent
  • All changes are identical in pattern: updating the same reusable workflow reference

⚠️ Project memory consideration

  • No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository

Testing

⚠️ Testing Requirements

  • N/A for this change type - These are GitHub Actions workflow updates
  • Recommendation: Verify that the build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4 workflow exists and is compatible with the calling workflows
  • The workflows should be tested by triggering them in a non-production context if possible

Documentation

CHANGELOG.md updated

  • No CHANGELOG.md update detected in this diff
  • Action Required: This version bump should be documented in CHANGELOG.md with:
    • Version number or date
    • Description: "Updated build-failure-slack-notification workflow reference from v3 to v4"
    • List of affected workflow files

Readme/API docs

  • N/A - No user-facing API or feature changes

Inline comments

  • N/A - Workflow files are self-documenting

Markdown formatting

  • N/A - No markdown files modified

Security

No hardcoded credentials

  • Secrets are properly referenced using ${{ secrets.SLACK_BOT_TOKEN }}

Input validation

  • N/A - No new input handling

Proper error handling

  • N/A - No error handling code modified

No sensitive data in logs

  • No logging changes

No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings

  • No license files or sensitive data detected

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor documentation request

This PR performs a clean, systematic upgrade of the build-failure-slack-notification reusable workflow reference from v3 to v4 across 8 GitHub Actions workflow files:

Files Modified (all at the same line pattern):

  1. .github/workflows/add-labels-standardized.yaml:25
  2. .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage-dependabot.yaml:24
  3. .github/workflows/add-to-project-garage.yaml:27
  4. .github/workflows/create-sphinx-documentation.yaml:57
  5. .github/workflows/pylint.yaml:54
  6. .github/workflows/pytest-darwin.yaml:81
  7. .github/workflows/pytest-linux.yaml:82
  8. .github/workflows/pytest-windows.yaml:80

Strengths:

  • Consistent change pattern across all files
  • No security concerns
  • Proper secret handling maintained
  • Clean, focused change scope

Recommendations:

  1. Add CHANGELOG.md entry documenting this infrastructure update
  2. Verify v4 compatibility: Ensure the target workflow (senzing-factory/build-resources/.github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4) exists and maintains API compatibility with v3
  3. Consider testing: If possible, trigger one of these workflows to verify the v4 integration works as expected before merging

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Analysis

I'll analyze this pull request against the specified checklist.

Overview

This PR updates the version reference for the build-failure-slack-notification.yaml workflow from @v3 to @v4 across 8 GitHub Actions workflow files.


Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

The changes are minimal version bumps in YAML workflow files. The formatting and structure follow GitHub Actions conventions.

✅ No commented-out code

No commented-out code present in the diff.

✅ Meaningful variable names

N/A - This PR only changes version tags, no variables are introduced or modified.

✅ DRY principle followed

The change is repetitive across 8 files, but this is expected for workflow configuration. The reusable workflow pattern itself follows DRY by centralizing the notification logic.

✅ Identify Defects

No logic errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities identified. The changes are straightforward version updates. All files:

  • Maintain the same job structure
  • Keep conditional logic intact
  • Preserve secret passing
  • Use consistent parameter passing

⚠️ Project memory configuration

No ./.claude/CLAUDE.md file was found to review against.


Testing

⚠️ Unit tests for new functions

N/A - This is a workflow configuration update, not application code. The referenced workflow (@v4) should have its own tests in the build-resources repository.

⚠️ Integration tests for new endpoints

N/A - No application endpoints affected.

⚠️ Edge cases covered

The workflow conditionals remain unchanged and continue to handle failure/cancellation cases appropriately.

⚠️ Test coverage > 80%

N/A - Not applicable to workflow configuration files.

Note: The actual functionality change depends on what's in build-failure-slack-notification.yaml@v4. The PR should ideally reference release notes or changelog for that workflow version.


Documentation

❌ Readme updated if needed

There is no documentation explaining:

  • Why the version bump from v3 to v4 is necessary
  • What changes in v4 affect these workflows
  • Whether this is a breaking change or compatible upgrade

Recommendation: Add a brief note in the PR description or commit message explaining the reason for the upgrade.

✅ API docs updated

N/A - No API changes.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

No complex logic introduced; version bumps are self-explanatory.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

No evidence of CHANGELOG.md being updated in this diff. If this project maintains a changelog, it should include an entry for this infrastructure update.

Files to check:

  • CHANGELOG.md (not present in diff)

✅ Markdown files formatting

No markdown files were modified in this PR.


Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

No credentials in the diff. Secrets continue to be passed securely via ${{ secrets.SLACK_BOT_TOKEN }}.

✅ Input validation implemented

N/A - The workflow passes through job status values that are GitHub-provided.

✅ Proper error handling

The conditional logic for triggering notifications remains intact across all files.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

No logging changes that could expose sensitive data.

✅ No license files checked in

No .lic files or AQAAAD strings present in the diff.


Summary

✅ Approved Items (10)

  • Code quality and structure
  • No security issues
  • No defects identified
  • Proper secret handling maintained

❌ Issues Requiring Attention (2)

  1. Missing Documentation (Medium Priority)

    • No README or changelog updates explaining the v3→v4 upgrade
    • Recommendation: Add release notes reference or explanation of what changed in v4
  2. No CHANGELOG.md Update (Low Priority)

    • If the project maintains a changelog, this infrastructure update should be noted
    • Recommendation: Check if CHANGELOG.md exists and add entry

⚠️ Information Needed

  • What's new in v4? - Link to build-resources release notes would help reviewers understand the impact
  • Breaking changes? - Confirm v4 is backward compatible or if any workflow adjustments are needed

Final Verdict

APPROVED with minor documentation recommendations

The code changes are safe and mechanically correct. The version bump appears to be a routine maintenance update across workflow files. However, adding context about why v4 is being adopted would improve traceability and help future maintainers.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

…ild-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Claude Code Review

⚠️ No file changes detected - skipping code review.

This PR appears to contain only metadata changes (labels, description, etc.).

@docktermj docktermj merged commit 875a436 into main Feb 17, 2026
48 checks passed
@docktermj docktermj deleted the dependabot/github_actions/senzing-factory/build-resources/dot-github/workflows/build-failure-slack-notification.yaml-4 branch February 17, 2026 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants